Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:36:40 -0000
"Johan Boulé" wrote:
> I don't know in practice, but it might be a bit more fragile
> tho, because the `touch -r` command ought to have the maximum resolution
> supported by the filesystem and not truncate any part of the mtime.
I just realised that this would still work if the mtime was truncated :)
> I don't know in practice, but it might be a bit more fragile
> tho, because the `touch -r` command ought to have the maximum resolution
> supported by the filesystem and not truncate any part of the mtime.
I just realised that this would still work if the mtime was truncated :)
Received on 2019-08-28 11:38:45