Subject: Re: [SG10] P0018 and P0170: lambda-related changes
From: Jason Merrill (jason_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-11 13:28:18
On 03/11/2016 02:27 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>>> I think it would be perfectly reasonable to bump __cpp_constexpr
>>> for lambdas.
>> Fine with me.
> If anyone doesn't agree with this direction, please speak up.
>>> But I'm still leaning towards having a separate macro for
>>> capturing *this, at least in part for consistency with
> I made a couple of proposals for the name of this new macro:
> Any preferences, or alternate suggestions?
I prefer the second, or perhaps __cpp_capture_this_value.
SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com