Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:27:48 -0300
On 3/11/2016 4:14 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to
> indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of
> replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes".
>
> So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment.
I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken.
That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the
bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it.
Regards,
> Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to
> indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of
> replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes".
>
> So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment.
I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken.
That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the
bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it.
Regards,
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Received on 2016-03-11 20:28:09