C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] P0304: constexpr addressof
From: Agustín Bergé (agustinberge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-11 13:27:48

On 3/11/2016 4:14 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to
> indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of
> replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes".
> So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment.

I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken.
That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the
bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it.


Agustín K-ballo Bergé

SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org