Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:27:25 -0500
On 03/11/2016 02:18 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>> On 03/10/2016 02:30 AM, Agustín Bergé wrote:
>>> For P0036, "Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs", maybe bump
>>> `__cpp_fold_expressions`?
>>
>> No. If you want your code to be compatible for both C++14 and
>> C++17, simply write the (previously implicit) default yourself.
>> No need for an #ifdef.
>
> Agustin, do you still think a macro would be worthwhile for this?
There are no fold-expressions in C++14. But bumping the macro is
trivial and does no harm.
Jason
>> On 03/10/2016 02:30 AM, Agustín Bergé wrote:
>>> For P0036, "Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs", maybe bump
>>> `__cpp_fold_expressions`?
>>
>> No. If you want your code to be compatible for both C++14 and
>> C++17, simply write the (previously implicit) default yourself.
>> No need for an #ifdef.
>
> Agustin, do you still think a macro would be worthwhile for this?
There are no fold-expressions in C++14. But bumping the macro is
trivial and does no harm.
Jason
Received on 2016-03-11 20:27:31