Subject: [SG10] P0018 and P0170: lambda-related changes
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-11 13:27:22
> > I think it would be perfectly reasonable to bump __cpp_constexpr
> > for lambdas.
> Fine with me.
If anyone doesn't agree with this direction, please speak up.
> > But I'm still leaning towards having a separate macro for
> > capturing *this, at least in part for consistency with
> > __cpp_init_capture.
I made a couple of proposals for the name of this new macro:
Any preferences, or alternate suggestions?
SG10 list run by email@example.com