2016-03-11 20:27 GMT+01:00 Agustín Bergé <agustinberge_at_[hidden]>:
> On 3/11/2016 4:14 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>> Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to
>> indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of
>> replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes".
>>
>> So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment.
>
> I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken.
> That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the
> bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it.

I tentatively agree, I see no need for a feature macro here.

- Daniel