Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:30:21 -0300
On 3/11/2016 4:18 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>> On 03/10/2016 02:30 AM, Agustín Bergé wrote:
>>> For P0036, "Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs", maybe bump
>>> `__cpp_fold_expressions`?
>>
>> No. If you want your code to be compatible for both C++14 and
>> C++17, simply write the (previously implicit) default yourself.
>> No need for an #ifdef.
>
> Agustin, do you still think a macro would be worthwhile for this?
I'm not certain. We have new wording, so I think the macro should be
bumped. But that doesn't mean I think people should be relying on the
original specification.
Perhaps the change is not considered significant enough to grant a bump?
Regards,
>> On 03/10/2016 02:30 AM, Agustín Bergé wrote:
>>> For P0036, "Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs", maybe bump
>>> `__cpp_fold_expressions`?
>>
>> No. If you want your code to be compatible for both C++14 and
>> C++17, simply write the (previously implicit) default yourself.
>> No need for an #ifdef.
>
> Agustin, do you still think a macro would be worthwhile for this?
I'm not certain. We have new wording, so I think the macro should be
bumped. But that doesn't mean I think people should be relying on the
original specification.
Perhaps the change is not considered significant enough to grant a bump?
Regards,
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Received on 2016-03-11 20:30:45