Saturday, 26 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
Friday, 25 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- Re: [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
- [std-proposals] The Lakos rule, undefined behaviour and noexcept
Tuesday, 22 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
Monday, 21 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Promote std::bit_cast into an actual keyword "bit_cast"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Promote std::bit_cast into an actual keyword "bit_cast"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: allow implicit conversion from void * to X *
Sunday, 20 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: allow implicit conversion from void * to X *
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: allow implicit conversion from void * to X *
Friday, 18 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
Thursday, 17 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
Tuesday, 15 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
Thursday, 10 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] P4334R0 C++ Contracts
- Re: [std-proposals] P4334R0 C++ Contracts
- Re: [std-proposals] P4334R0 C++ Contracts
Monday, 7 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
Friday, 4 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
Thursday, 3 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Jan Schultke, about ``[](this &x) { decltype(x) x; }``
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter:'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter:'struct this'
- [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
Tuesday, 1 September 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
