Alejandro Colomar
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
Anoop Rana
Bingzhi
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] Jan Schultke, about ``[](this &x) { decltype(x) x; }``
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter:'struct this'
Bo Persson
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
David Brown
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
Ell
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
Fabio Alemagna
Frederick Virchanza Gotham
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
Gašper Ažman
Giuseppe D'Angelo
HHN
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
Jan Schultke
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter:'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
Jens Maurer
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
Jonathan Grant
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] P4334R0 C++ Contracts
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
Keenan Horrigan
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
Liam Graham
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Promote std::bit_cast into an actual keyword "bit_cast"
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
Light And Ray
Marcin Jaczewski
Peter Bindels
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] P4334R0 C++ Contracts
Rainer Deyke
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
Sebastian Wittmeier
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] Should a default argument provide the default template type?
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] Deprecate int
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
shyeyian_at
Simon Schröder
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Reintroduce register — wise for developer-first decisions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 90, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Standardise one cast — a cast’s a cast
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
Thiago Macieira
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: allow implicit conversion from void * to X *
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept(static)
Thibault Ricord-Marchal
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Nested structured bindings
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Promote std::bit_cast into an actual keyword "bit_cast"
- Re: [std-proposals] An abbreviatted explicit object parameter: 'struct this'
Tiago Freire
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: reintroduce tag namespace
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: allow implicit conversion from void * to X *
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
- Re: [std-proposals] fine-control exception/error/UB handling on function boundary
Veгified ✔
Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [std-proposals] PROPOSAL: Heading back towards automatic storage duration "auto"
- Re: [std-proposals] std::came_from_new [[must_new]]
Vinnie Falco
vxadminMx
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
- [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: Fallback Deterministic Reference Counting for Unprovable Lifetime Profiles
