Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:31:30 +0100
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:28 PM Brian Bi wrote:
>
> As far as I'm concerned, P2025 is dead unless I see evidence to the
> contrary. Future proposals should simply discuss it and then move on.
What do you reckon about having 'factory' and 'after_factory' instead
of P2025? It would mean that the core language stays intact, and we
just have two new library functions.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, P2025 is dead unless I see evidence to the
> contrary. Future proposals should simply discuss it and then move on.
What do you reckon about having 'factory' and 'after_factory' instead
of P2025? It would mean that the core language stays intact, and we
just have two new library functions.
Received on 2024-07-11 14:31:42