std-proposals

Sunday, 30 June 2019

• Re: span: why no size_type? Arthur O'Dwyer
• span: why no size_type? Andrey Semashev

Friday, 28 June 2019

• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Francis Grizzly Smit
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Bjorn Reese
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Dejan Milosavljevic
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Magnus Fromreide

Thursday, 27 June 2019

• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Charles Milette
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Kyle Knoepfel
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Jake Arkinstall
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Tom Honermann
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Kyle Knoepfel
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Tae Lim Kook
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Arthur O'Dwyer
• Optional braces for function definitions in some contexts Kyle Knoepfel
• About PCYNLITX project and its innovations ( for C+++ multi-threading ) Erkam Murat Bozkurt

Wednesday, 26 June 2019

• Improve std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t Nemanja Boric
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Zhihao Yuan
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke

Tuesday, 25 June 2019

• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Zhihao Yuan
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Victor Zverovich
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Zhihao Yuan
• Re: Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke
• Fwd: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Victor Zverovich
• Re: Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Zhihao Yuan
• Internal fill *not* considered harmful (re: P1652) Matthew Woehlke

Friday, 21 June 2019

• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Thiago Macieira

Thursday, 20 June 2019

• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Idea: "friend" scope Ville Voutilainen
• Idea: "friend" scope Matthew Woehlke

Saturday, 15 June 2019

• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Charles Milette
• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Nevin Liber
• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Ivan Matek

Friday, 14 June 2019

• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Jake Arkinstall
• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Matthew Woehlke
• Re: Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Thiago Macieira
• Was there ever proposal/discussion of private namespace or private using? Ivan Matek

Monday, 10 June 2019

• Re: Allow virtual base classes in constexpr Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Allow virtual base classes in constexpr Brian Bi
• Re: Allow virtual base classes in constexpr Arthur O'Dwyer

Saturday, 8 June 2019

• Re: Formalisation of std::get<>'s behavior with regards to concurrency Giuseppe D'Angelo

Friday, 7 June 2019

• Formalisation of std::get<>'s behavior with regards to concurrency Francois Chabot

Thursday, 6 June 2019

• Re: Resolving Static Initialization Order Fiasco by standardizing `weak` and `naked` symbols Thiago Macieira
• Re: Resolving Static Initialization Order Fiasco by standardizing `weak` and `naked` symbols Henry Miller

Wednesday, 5 June 2019

• Resolving Static Initialization Order Fiasco by standardizing `weak` and `naked` symbols Omer Rosler
• Re: Templated access to the standard integer types? John McFarlane

Tuesday, 4 June 2019

• Re: Allow virtual base classes in constexpr Brian Bi

Monday, 3 June 2019

• Re: is_deletable type traits Arthur O'Dwyer

Sunday, 2 June 2019

• Re: is_deletable type traits Zoe Carver
• Re: is_deletable type traits Nicolas Lesser
• Re: is_deletable type traits Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: String contains member function Tony V E
• is_deletable type traits Zoe Carver
• Re: String contains member function Paul Fee
• Re: String contains member function Ville Voutilainen
• Re: String contains member function Pedro Alves
• Re: Templated access to the standard integer types? Eyal Rozenberg
• Re: Templated access to the standard integer types? John McFarlane
• Templated access to the standard integer types? Eyal Rozenberg

Last message date: 2019-06-30 16:36:43