Andrey Semashev
Andy Wang
- Re: std::atomic_ref<T> enables mixed size and mixed atomicity accesses which are not defined under C++11 memory model
- std::atomic_ref<T> enables mixed size and mixed atomicity accesses which are not defined under C++11 memory model
Bo Persson
Brian Bi
- Re: Templated entity: non-template friend function
- Re: Shouldn't members need equal alignments to be in the common initial sequence?
- Shouldn't members need equal alignments to be in the common initial sequence?
- Does an enum type have the same size, alignment, and value representation as its underlying type?
Daniel Krügler
David Friberg
Giuseppe D'Angelo
Jarosław Lipowski
Jason Cobb
Jason McKesson
Jens Maurer
- Re: std::atomic_ref<T> enables mixed size and mixed atomicity accesses which are not defined under C++11 memory model
- Re: Indexes in ranged loops for all containers
- Re: Shouldn't members need equal alignments to be in the common initial sequence?
- Re: Bugfix submissions for the Standard's text
- Re: Shouldn't members need equal alignments to be in the common initial sequence?
Joey Pendergrast
Kilian Henneberger
language.lawyer_at
Lénárd Szolnoki
- Re: Templated entity: non-template friend function
- Re: Templated entity: non-template friend function
Myria
- Re: Reasoning for strict aliasing enums from underlying type
- Reasoning for strict aliasing enums from underlying type
Tim O'Neil
Vladimir Grigoriev
- Empty type
- Re: Templated entity: non-template friend function
- Templated entity: non-template friend function
William Linkmeyer
- Re: Shouldn't members need equal alignments to be in the common initial sequence?
- Re: Does an enum type have the same size, alignment, and value representation as its underlying type?