Are we sure we will never want pytlon-like :-based slicing syntax?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 07:58 Isabella Muerte via Ext <ext_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> From what I understand the backtick (`) is available in all existing
> character sets, including EBCDIC. Instead of ^, perhaps surrounding
> something within backticks would be the way to go. e.g.,
>
> int var = 42;
>
> auto info = `var`;
>
>
> I understand that this would make writing markdown without triple backtick
> support "not fun", but if we made decisions for C++ based on how nice a web
> page generator looked, we wouldn't have quite a few features I reckon.
>
> As a brief addendum, I do like the use of [: :]. It keeps banana clips ([|
> and|] respectively) open for our use in the future.
>
> On February 15, 2021, EWG <ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrew, Wyatt, and Daveed kindly finished the paper which was mentioned
> during last SG7 session and because the next SG7 meeting is next week *I
> would like all of you to read the paper and send feedback to SG7 mailing
> list*, so we have as much of information as possible.
>
> The paper is here: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2320R0.pdf and it
> will be part of the next mailing.
>
> Hana
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ext mailing list
> Ext_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ext
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/ext/2021/02/15887.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ext mailing list
> Ext_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ext
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/ext/2021/02/15895.php
>