Are we sure we will never want pytlon-like :-based slicing syntax?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 07:58 Isabella Muerte via Ext <ext@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
From what I understand the backtick (`) is available in all existing character sets, including EBCDIC. Instead of ^, perhaps surrounding something within backticks would be the way to go. e.g.,

int var = 42;

auto info = `var`;

I understand that this would make writing markdown without triple backtick support "not fun", but if we made decisions for C++ based on how nice a web page generator looked, we wouldn't have quite a few features I reckon.

As a brief addendum, I do like the use of [: :]. It keeps banana clips ([| and|] respectively) open for our use in the future.

On February 15, 2021, EWG <ext@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Hi,

Andrew, Wyatt, and Daveed kindly finished the paper which was mentioned during last SG7 session and because the next SG7 meeting is next week I would like all of you to read the paper and send feedback to SG7 mailing list, so we have as much of information as possible.

The paper is here: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2320R0.pdf and it will be part of the next mailing.

Hana


_______________________________________________
Ext mailing list
Ext@lists.isocpp.org
Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ext
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/ext/2021/02/15887.php
_______________________________________________
Ext mailing list
Ext@lists.isocpp.org
Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ext
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/ext/2021/02/15895.php