Hi Corentin,

“Down with character”:


  * In [lex.comment], “Unicode code point” needs to be pluralized

Other than that, the papers seem well-motivated and I was unable to spot any wording issues.

Thanks for all your hard work,

              Peter

From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Corentin Jabot via SG16
Sent: 24 January 2023 20:40
To: sg16_at_lists.isocpp.org
Cc: Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>; Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2023-01-25 SG16 telecon​

EXTERNAL MAIL
Down with character: applied Alisdair feedback, added wording for [cpp] and [basic] https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EPHwwFdX7NN_CLOIyzJaoY1dz9evPv7PQgJFx8aVf9OOlPFDvtIg5nqRtLtfV67B68ijjf-K9bWl_8o$>

Referencing the unicode standard: applied SG-16 suggestion and the wording suggestion made by Jens on mattermost. I would prefer a solution that does not preserve the term ucs2, i think, but it's in a deprecated annex so... good enough! https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2736R1.pdf<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/D2736R1.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EPHwwFdX7NN_CLOIyzJaoY1dz9evPv7PQgJFx8aVf9OOlPFDvtIg5nqRtLtfV67B68ijjf-K_HXlkSA$>


I'll keep tweaking tomorrow but it should allow us to make progress during tomorrow's meeting.