On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 8:07 PM Peter Brett <pbrett_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi Corentin,
>
>
>
> “Down with character”:
>
>
>
> - In [lex.comment], “Unicode code point” needs to be pluralized
>
> Fixed!

>
> -
>
> Other than that, the papers seem well-motivated and I was unable to spot
> any wording issues.
>
>
>
> Thanks for all your hard work,
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> *From:* SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> *On Behalf Of *Corentin
> Jabot via SG16
> *Sent:* 24 January 2023 20:40
> *To:* sg16_at_[hidden]
> *Cc:* Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>; Tom Honermann <
> tom_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2023-01-25 SG16 telecon
>
>
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
> Down with character: applied Alisdair feedback, added wording for [cpp]
> and [basic] https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EPHwwFdX7NN_CLOIyzJaoY1dz9evPv7PQgJFx8aVf9OOlPFDvtIg5nqRtLtfV67B68ijjf-K9bWl_8o$>
>
>
>
> Referencing the unicode standard: applied SG-16 suggestion and the wording
> suggestion made by Jens on mattermost. I would prefer a solution that does
> not preserve the term ucs2, i think, but it's in a deprecated annex so...
> good enough! https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2736R1.pdf
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/D2736R1.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EPHwwFdX7NN_CLOIyzJaoY1dz9evPv7PQgJFx8aVf9OOlPFDvtIg5nqRtLtfV67B68ijjf-K_HXlkSA$>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'll keep tweaking tomorrow but it should allow us to make progress
> during tomorrow's meeting.
>
>
>
>