C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Agenda for the 2023-01-25 SG16 telecon​

From: Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:40:23 +0100
Down with character: applied Alisdair feedback, added wording for [cpp] and
[basic] https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf

Referencing the unicode standard: applied SG-16 suggestion and the wording
suggestion made by Jens on mattermost. I would prefer a solution that does
not preserve the term ucs2, i think, but it's in a deprecated annex so...
good enough! https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2736R1.pdf

I'll keep tweaking tomorrow but it should allow us to make progress
during tomorrow's meeting.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:55 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is your friendly reminder that this meeting is taking place tomorrow.
> Tom.
> On 1/23/23 12:45 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, January 25th, at 19:30 UTC (timezone
> conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20230125T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>
> ).
> The agenda follows.
> - Planning for NOT Issaquah.
> - P2736R0 <https://wg21.link/p2736r0>: Referencing the Unicode
> Standard.
> - D2749R0 <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf>: Down with
> ”character”
> We agreed to hold a SG16 meeting in Issaquah during the 2023-01-11 SG16
> telecon <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-11th-2023>.
> Unfortunately, that isn't going to happen due to a lack of conference rooms
> available during regular business hours and previous discussions regarding
> meeting before or after regular business hours did not have consensus. That
> leaves us with just this upcoming telecon currently scheduled to dispense
> with our remaining NB comments. I'm hopeful that we'll be able to poll
> forwarding P2736 at this meeting, but I'm skeptical that we'll get to a
> point where we are comfortable polling P2749. However, I would be happy to
> schedule an additional telecon for 2023-02-01 if we agree there is a
> reasonable chance that we'll be able to establish a position on that paper
> by then.
> We continued discussion of P2736R0 (Referencing the Unicode Standard)
> during the 2023-01-11 SG16 telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-11th-2023> and
> identified a few issues to be addressed. Corentin has requested some
> assistance, both on the SG16 mailing list
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2023/01/3664.php> and in the SG16
> Mattermost channel <https://chat.isocpp.org/general/channels/sg16-unicode>.
> If you can help out, please do so! (Sorry, Corentin, I've been playing too
> much catchup lately). Note that Fraser also expressed a view regarding
> the __STDC_ISO_10646__ macro
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2023/01/3663.php>; it would be helpful to
> have other comments either in agreement or in opposition to that view.
> D2749R0 (Down with ”character”) was on the agenda for our last telecon,
> but we ran out of time. We last discussed the related NB comment during the 2022-12-14
> SG16 telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#december-14th-2022>. This
> paper is relatively long due to its wording impact. Please take the time to
> read the motivation and at least scan through the wording changes. I
> encourage everyone to reacquaint themselves with the terminology used in UTR
> #17 <https://unicode.org/reports/tr17/> beforehand as well.
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16

Received on 2023-01-24 20:40:38