>From a text point of view, I just think the normal concerns about mixing
literal and execution encoding, and handling the different U encodings for
strings.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 13:10 Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> EWG is scheduled to review P1819 (Interpolated Literals)
> <http://wg21.link/P1819> during its 2022-08-04 telecon. I believe EWG
> will only be performing an initial review to provide feedback to the author
> (CC'd). I won't be able to attend, but encourage other SG16 regulars to do
> so.
>
> It is not obvious to me whether there are text related concerns sufficient
> to justify SG16 spending time on this paper. Please respond with any
> opinions you might have. If EWG expresses disinterest in the paper, SG16
> won't spend time on it unless I hear overwhelming support that would
> suggest desire to challenge EWG's direction in that case.
>
> One question SG16 could address is whether support for interpolated
> strings should be extended to all string literal kinds. The paper proposes f"text
> {expression}" but is silent regarding whether something like u8f"text
> {expression}" or fL"text {expression}" should be supported (and if so,
> whether there is an ordering requirement between the encoding-prefix and
> the interpolated-string prefix). What other concerns do you believe should
> fall under SG16 purview?
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>