From a text point of view, I just think the normal concerns about mixing literal and execution encoding, and handling the different U encodings for strings. 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 13:10 Tom Honermann via SG16 <> wrote:

EWG is scheduled to review P1819 (Interpolated Literals) during its 2022-08-04 telecon. I believe EWG will only be performing an initial review to provide feedback to the author (CC'd). I won't be able to attend, but encourage other SG16 regulars to do so.

It is not obvious to me whether there are text related concerns sufficient to justify SG16 spending time on this paper. Please respond with any opinions you might have. If EWG expresses disinterest in the paper, SG16 won't spend time on it unless I hear overwhelming support that would suggest desire to challenge EWG's direction in that case.

One question SG16 could address is whether support for interpolated strings should be extended to all string literal kinds. The paper proposes f"text {expression}" but is silent regarding whether something like u8f"text {expression}" or fL"text {expression}" should be supported (and if so, whether there is an ordering requirement between the encoding-prefix and the interpolated-string prefix). What other concerns do you believe should fall under SG16 purview?


SG16 mailing list