C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: [SG16] P2071 - Named universal character escapes

From: Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:31:37 -0400
https://github.com/cygri/htmldiff
And I was surprised at how well it worked out of the box. That was
just `htmldiff p2071r0.html d2071r1.html > diff.html `

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:35 AM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Thanks, Steve! What did you use to generate the marked up diff? Whatever
> it was produced a great result!
>
> Tom.
>
> On 9/16/21 5:31 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
>
> I've attached a marked up rich difference between the two versions on
> github. It does look like it's a sensible state, although yes, wording will
> need updates.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:38 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I attached a draft R1 with changes I had previously worked on. I briefly
>> looked at it and I don't think I left it in a half-baked state, but it
>> would be worth diffing it against the P0 revision with a reasonable HTML
>> diffing tool to make sure. The "Changes since P2071R0" section suggest I
>> addressed the issues raised in Prague.
>>
>> The todo list I have includes:
>>
>> - Add discussion regarding the use of \N{...} in identifiers.
>> - Add a proposal option to allow use of \N{...} in identifiers.
>> - Rebase wording on the current WD; particularly due to the adoption
>> of P2029.
>> - Implement the proposal.
>>
>> Richard Smith had requested that \N{...} be allowed in identifiers for
>> consistency with \u and \U. We should, of course, just acknowledge that
>> Richard is always right and do that :)
>>
>> Wording changes may additionally be needed for P2314. Maybe for one or
>> more of Corentin's recent papers as well.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>> On 9/15/21 3:21 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
>>
>> https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/798#issuecomment-585750666
>> has notes from JF
>>
>> EWG Prague Thursday afternoon:
>>
>> We’re interested in supporting named universal character escapes.
>> SF F N A SA
>> 14 5 0 0 0
>>
>> This should further support aliases.
>> SF F N A SA
>> 18 2 1 0 0
>>
>> It should further be case insensitive.
>> SF F N A SA
>> 0 6 6 9 2
>>
>> It should further support UAX44-LM2 with arbitrary spaces and dashes.
>> SF F N A SA
>> 1 4 5 8 5
>>
>> The paper is *not* tentatively ready yet. We want to see the updated
>> paper before marking it as tentatively ready.
>>
>>
>> I missed Prague, but this might be enough, if you don't have any more
>> detailed notes. I can check the wiki as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/15/21 2:31 PM, Steve Downey wrote:
>>> > If I am reading the github correctly, EWG would like to see some
>>> > revision before picking it up again. Is there something I can
>>> > help with? This looks like it's really close and desired and quite
>>> > possible for 23?
>>>
>>> Yes. I recall there not being much to do, but I need to find my list of
>>> what that is. I would very much appreciate the help. I'll hunt down that
>>> list and try to get it to you later today or tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Tom.
>>
>>
>

Received on 2021-09-17 09:32:11