On 5/3/21 10:35 AM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the notes! I want to clarify the following with the
> rationale that I believe I did speak to during the meeting:
>
> Hubert suggested that it makes sense to respect the locale parameter.
> =>
> Hubert noted that under the C++20 wording, implementations trying to
> accomodate this tentative future direction may be more able to ignore
> the global locale than an explicit locale argument. So, a change that
> maintains respecting the locale parameter is more compatible with C++20.

Thank you, Hubert, updated! I knew I was missing something there.

Tom.

>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Hubert Tong
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:43 AM Tom Honermann via SG16
> <sg16_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> The summary for the SG16 meeting held April 28th, 2021 is now
> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest
> corrections:
>
> * https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#april-28th-2021
>
> No decisions were made at this meeting, but several polls were
> taken regarding LWG3547 <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3547>.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG16_at_[hidden]>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>