Hi Tom,
Thanks for the notes! I want to clarify the following with the rationale that I believe I did speak to during the meeting:
Hubert suggested that it makes sense to respect the locale parameter.
=>
Hubert noted that under the C++20 wording, implementations trying to accomodate this tentative future direction may be more able to ignore the global locale than an explicit locale argument. So, a change that maintains respecting the locale parameter is more compatible with C++20.
Thank you, Hubert, updated! I knew I was missing something
there.
Tom.
Thanks,
Hubert Tong
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:43 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
--The summary for the SG16 meeting held April 28th, 2021 is now available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
No decisions were made at this meeting, but several polls were taken regarding LWG3547.
Tom.
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16