Hi Tom,

Thanks for the notes! I want to clarify the following with the rationale
that I believe I did speak to during the meeting:

Hubert suggested that it makes sense to respect the locale parameter.
=>
Hubert noted that under the C++20 wording, implementations trying to
accomodate this tentative future direction may be more able to ignore the
global locale than an explicit locale argument. So, a change that maintains
respecting the locale parameter is more compatible with C++20.

Thanks,


Hubert Tong


On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:43 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The summary for the SG16 meeting held April 28th, 2021 is now available.
> For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
>
> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#april-28th-2021
>
> No decisions were made at this meeting, but several polls were taken
> regarding LWG3547 <https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3547>.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>