And how does having no contracts at all for at least 3 more years help you
gain that missing functionality earlier than the current expectation?

On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 5:04 PM Ville Voutilainen <
ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 14:47, Andrei Zissu <andrziss_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > And those that don't have their use case satisfied can't rely on
> workarounds, same as they undoubtedly have been doing for years, and wait 3
> more years until we have a more complete contracts feature? Is there
> anything in the current MVP closing the door on this eventuality?
>
> The workarounds do not allow integrating with the same violation
> handler as the other use cases can.
>