Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:04:38 +0200
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 14:47, Andrei Zissu <andrziss_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> And those that don't have their use case satisfied can't rely on workarounds, same as they undoubtedly have been doing for years, and wait 3 more years until we have a more complete contracts feature? Is there anything in the current MVP closing the door on this eventuality?
The workarounds do not allow integrating with the same violation
handler as the other use cases can.
>
> And those that don't have their use case satisfied can't rely on workarounds, same as they undoubtedly have been doing for years, and wait 3 more years until we have a more complete contracts feature? Is there anything in the current MVP closing the door on this eventuality?
The workarounds do not allow integrating with the same violation
handler as the other use cases can.
Received on 2025-10-27 15:04:51
