Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:13:30 -0400
On Thu, May 23, 2024, 10:27 Chuanqi Xu <chuanqi.xcq_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Yes, I personally agree. But my question actually is, there are library
> vendors don't buy it. For example, the libc++ developers say no explicitly.
>
In that case we need a proposal on how to annotate, in the code of the
importable unit, that the importing unit must generate weak versions of the
symbols that would otherwise be provided by the library
Trying to handle this only in the build system is a really bad idea, IMHO.
Daniel
>
> Yes, I personally agree. But my question actually is, there are library
> vendors don't buy it. For example, the libc++ developers say no explicitly.
>
In that case we need a proposal on how to annotate, in the code of the
importable unit, that the importing unit must generate weak versions of the
symbols that would otherwise be provided by the library
Trying to handle this only in the build system is a really bad idea, IMHO.
Daniel
>
Received on 2024-05-23 16:13:41