Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:47:23 +0100
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:01:10AM -0500, Tom Honermann via SG15 wrote:
> On 12/19/23 5:14 PM, Steve Downey via SG15 wrote:
> > ${prefix}/share/libc++/v1 , since usr is a prefix?
>
> I agree; that would better match the layout for my local installs. My
> ${prefix}/share location currently contains directories named clang, man,
> opt-viewer, scan-build, and scan-view.
Indeed ${prefix}/share/libc++/v1 seems a better location.
> None of those have versioned subdirectories, but the v1 is consistent
> with the placement of libc++ header files under ${prefix}/include/c++.
I like to keep the v1. I don't have an immediate use-case but not
putting them directly in libc++ makes it easier when we have a need for
multiple versions of the cppm files.
Mark
> On 12/19/23 5:14 PM, Steve Downey via SG15 wrote:
> > ${prefix}/share/libc++/v1 , since usr is a prefix?
>
> I agree; that would better match the layout for my local installs. My
> ${prefix}/share location currently contains directories named clang, man,
> opt-viewer, scan-build, and scan-view.
Indeed ${prefix}/share/libc++/v1 seems a better location.
> None of those have versioned subdirectories, but the v1 is consistent
> with the placement of libc++ header files under ${prefix}/include/c++.
I like to keep the v1. I don't have an immediate use-case but not
putting them directly in libc++ makes it easier when we have a need for
multiple versions of the cppm files.
Mark
Received on 2023-12-20 18:47:27