On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:00 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> > On May 18, 2023, at 3:38 PM, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:09 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >> I highly recommend you talk to Thomas first. There may very well be
> >> permissible ways to reference it that get you what you are looking for.
> >
> > I asked in the editors group. The advice seems to be that as long as
> > there is an *immutable* version of a document that we want to refer to
> > as normative we can regardless of its provenance. The key being the
> > *immutable* version aspect. For semver it would mean referring to
> > <https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html>, or whatever specific version we
> > want. I.e. I think it's possible for semver. Which is great! As it
> > means that it gives us more flexibility. Especially in the ongoing
> > JSON vs. TOML arguments as the latter also has versioned definitions
> > (<https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0>).
>
> I’m not aware of these arguments, but in case any of those arguments have to do with standard references, note that JSON is standardized as ISO/IEC 21778:2017.

Right, I'm aware. The issue was about TOML, or YAML, etc would be
options as they are not ISO or other orgs standards.

-- 
-- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell
-- Don't Assume Anything  -- No Supone Nada
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net