[Peter]
> What's important here is not what I "request", but what we're giving up in
> terms of usability compared to what works today.

I believe that the "what we're giving up in terms of usability" is a vast over-statement. Right now, we have one complete implementation of C++20, and two in-flight implementations and people are already busy in doom predictions 😊

-- Gaby

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 10:32 AM
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_microsoft.com>; sg15_at_lists.isocpp.org; 'Daniel Ruoso' <daniel_at_ruoso.com>
Cc: 'Nathan Sidwell' <nathan_at_acm.org>; 'Tom Honermann' <tom_at_honermann.net>; ext_at_lists.isocpp.org
Subject: RE: [SG15] [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> [Peter]
> > You are correct that the requests don't stop here.
>
> Please, go talk to Tom 😊
> Let me know when you're on the same page and what the actual request is 😉

What's important here is not what I "request", but what we're giving up in
terms of usability compared to what works today.

I'm mostly in the skyscraper business, but we generally want C++ features
to have wide accessibility and not be limited to those building skyscrapers.