As I recall, we did not have consensus to evolve the ABI at Prague.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 04:13 Nathan Sidwell <nathan_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 3/8/20 5:01 PM, Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash via Ext wrote:
> > Do we have any ABI stability concerns regarding modularizing the
> > standard library? Certainly for strong module ownership implementations,
> > this is a concern, but for weak module ownership implementations it may
> > be a concern too, because the mangling of internal implementation
> > details with module linkage would change.
> >
> > Can implementations overcome this with special hacks for the standard
> > library that preserve the old mangled names?
>
> Some pushed for a breaking ABI change in Prague. This might be their
> opportunity!
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Nathan Sidwell
>