C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG15] module source suffixes
From: Johan Boulé (johan.boule_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-28 10:24:21

Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Remember that tools like make *assume* that if a recipe is run, its
> specified outputs are out-of-date (there is no equivalent of ninja's
> `restat = 1`).

I can speak only for GNU's version of make, but this is not the case with
that implementation: if the target is not changed by the recipe, it won't
forcibly be considered out of date when used as a prerequisite of another

> Better build tools that do hash comparison rather than
> mtime comparison may perform better. But BMI-writers should write
> outputs when they're told to do so. The *least* you can do to be
> reliable is to update the output mtime to the max(input_mtimes) because
> otherwise the rule will continue to be rerun because it is "out of
> date".

FI, the idiomatic way to handle this in GNU make is something along those

obj: bmi
        cp $< $@ # dummy compile

bmi: bmi.trigger
        cp mxx $@.new # dummy precompile
        test -e $@ && cmp $@.new $@ && rm $@.new || mv -v $@.new $@
        TZ=UTC touch -t 197001010000.01 $<

restarts:: mxx
        touch $@ bmi.trigger
-include restarts

>$@ echo foo # dummy source

SG15 list run by sg15-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older archives