Subject: Re: [SG15] module source suffixes
From: Ben Boeckel (ben.boeckel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-27 09:04:49
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:49:16 +0000, Olga Arkhipova via SG15 wrote:
> You still will be able to do it, but at least in MSVC case you'll have
> to explicitly tell the compiler (by setting /module:interface switch)
> that this cpp file is actually a module.
Is this a mutually exclusive thing? Would saying `/module:interface` for
a C++ TU without `export module foo;` be a problem?
SG15 list run by email@example.com