CC Evolution and SG2

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:13 AM Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
<brycelelbach_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I have reviewed the (many) polls that we took in SG15 today regarding
> conventions for module naming, lookup, and project structure (P1634
> and P1484):
>
> http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/ModuleNaming
>
> Here's the distilled outcome:
>
> CONSENSUS: In the C++ Modules Ecosystem Technical Report, recommend
> module naming conventions, but not project structure, file naming
> conventions, or namespace naming conventions.
>
> It is interesting to consider this in combination with the outcome we
> reached after discussing P1302:
>
> http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/P1302
>
> CONSENSUS: In the C++ Modules Ecosystem Technical Report, we want
> recommendations for implicit builds of modules which do not prescribe
> a particular project layout or file naming scheme.
>
> The second conclusion suggest to me that we want more field experience
> with fast dependency scanning technology, as this can be used to do
> implicit builds of modules without prescribing a particular file
> layout or file naming scheme.
>
> --
> Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
> CUDA Core C++ Libraries Lead @ NVIDIA
> ISO C++ Library Evolution Incubator Chair
> ISO C++ Tooling Chair
> CppCon and C++Now Program Chair
> CUDA Convert and Reformed AVX Junkie
>
> Sleep is for the weak
> --

-- 
Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
CUDA Core C++ Libraries Lead @ NVIDIA
ISO C++ Library Evolution Incubator Chair
ISO C++ Tooling Chair
CppCon and C++Now Program Chair
CUDA Convert and Reformed AVX Junkie
Sleep is for the weak
--