Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:57:05 -0400
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 19:15:20 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> - Bikeshedding. Feel free to suggest names for fields or the format
> itself, but please refrain from commenting on name suggestions
> themselves (in support for or against). I'll collect up all
> suggestions and we can discuss them in the future once we have the
> semantics nailed down.
Having seen no naming suggestions, I've submitted a patch to GCC which
writes the format specified here with all the `bikeshed-` prefixes
removed (still haven't found the time to write a patch for Clang).
Here are some names for the format itself that we've brainstormed here:
- sourcedep
- srcdep
- scandep
- semdep (for "semantic dependency")
Personally, I'm partial to "semdep".
Let the bikeshedding begin :) .
--Ben
> - Bikeshedding. Feel free to suggest names for fields or the format
> itself, but please refrain from commenting on name suggestions
> themselves (in support for or against). I'll collect up all
> suggestions and we can discuss them in the future once we have the
> semantics nailed down.
Having seen no naming suggestions, I've submitted a patch to GCC which
writes the format specified here with all the `bikeshed-` prefixes
removed (still haven't found the time to write a patch for Clang).
Here are some names for the format itself that we've brainstormed here:
- sourcedep
- srcdep
- scandep
- semdep (for "semantic dependency")
Personally, I'm partial to "semdep".
Let the bikeshedding begin :) .
--Ben
Received on 2019-04-03 22:57:23