C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [Tooling] [isocpp-modules] Dependency information for module-aware build tools

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:10:54 +0000
What would be a “legacy” audience here, specifically?

— Gaby

On Mar 4, 2019, at 4:58 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]<mailto:grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:25 PM Gabriel Dos Reis via Modules <modules_at_[hidden]<mailto:modules_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
The search path facility is there only for “convenience”, for quick-and-dirty examples: the recommended approach is to explicitly list the mapping providing the IFC for the modules. I continue to believe that is the right approach - but would love to be proven wrong.

It's best to investigate and test the various approaches not just your ideal. Depending on particular use cases one may be more appropriate than others. The TR needs to consider both the "legacy" and "future" audiences.

-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frobot-dreams.net%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cgdr%40microsoft.com%7C99f8ce2afb064100452608d6a1167657%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636873515188269178&sdata=PZTRrKsGGosIMSvin%2F%2FkjJB%2BN9GQtOGkqwGAThBVL9g%3D&reserved=0>

Received on 2019-03-05 06:10:58