Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:58:24 -0600
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:25 PM Gabriel Dos Reis via Modules <
modules_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The search path facility is there only for “convenience”, for
> quick-and-dirty examples: the recommended approach is to explicitly list
> the mapping providing the IFC for the modules. I continue to believe that
> is the right approach - but would love to be proven wrong.
>
It's best to investigate and test the various approaches not just your
ideal. Depending on particular use cases one may be more appropriate than
others. The TR needs to consider both the "legacy" and "future" audiences.
modules_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The search path facility is there only for “convenience”, for
> quick-and-dirty examples: the recommended approach is to explicitly list
> the mapping providing the IFC for the modules. I continue to believe that
> is the right approach - but would love to be proven wrong.
>
It's best to investigate and test the various approaches not just your
ideal. Depending on particular use cases one may be more appropriate than
others. The TR needs to consider both the "legacy" and "future" audiences.
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Received on 2019-03-05 03:58:37