Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 06:58:19 -0400
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:28 AM Boris Kolpackov <boris_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> A quick summary of the results: with ~300 answers, ~60% for the split
> layout (public headers in include/, sources and private headers in
> src/) and ~40% for the combined (everything in a single directory).
>
Does anyone think that a solution which requires >=40% of C++ codebases to
change their directory layouts is likely to achieve consensus?
wrote:
> A quick summary of the results: with ~300 answers, ~60% for the split
> layout (public headers in include/, sources and private headers in
> src/) and ~40% for the combined (everything in a single directory).
>
Does anyone think that a solution which requires >=40% of C++ codebases to
change their directory layouts is likely to achieve consensus?
Received on 2018-06-15 12:58:57