C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Reg: experience on boost:lockfree data structures

From: Domagoj Šarić <domagoj.saric_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:30:42 +0100
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:52 AM Honey Sukesan via SG14 <
sg14_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I would like to seek an opinion regarding boost:: interprocess::
> message_queue vs boost::lockfree::queue.
> Has anyone used boost::lockfree::queue or any of Boost.LockFree data
> structures in any embedded platforms?
> I have a producer-consumer scenario involving multiple threads. Tried out
> a sample code using int values pushing to/consuming from the queue &
> analysed elapsed time between push/pop on a Linux x86. It's found
> boost::lockfree::queue gives better time performance results compared to
> boost:: interprocess:: message_queue.
> Haven't tried this on actual hardware target yet. Our hardware target is
> an ARM based processor running QNX RTOS.
> I'm listening to Herb's CppCon talk on Lock-free programming now.
> It would be great if any of you has any other recommendations/pros or cons
> I need to be aware of before I fix boost::lockfree::queue rather than
> boost:: interprocess:: message_queue in our production code?
Have a look at https://github.com/cameron314/concurrentqueue ;)

Domagoj Šarić
Tech lead
C++ engineer
Microblink LTD
www.microblink.com <https://microblink.com/>

Received on 2023-01-18 14:30:54