This could be tricky given that constexpr's aren't compile-time
guaranteed, hence there would be a necessary debug mechanism to
distinguish between constexpr's which are in fact being compile-time
evaluated and those which aren't. Which would be useful anyway, in my
opinion. I don't use them so am not sure whether any compiler ash that
feature.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14248235/when-does-a-constexpr-function-get-evaluated-at-compile-time

On 14/02/2019 2:25 p.m., Scott Wardle wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was looking through C++ papers and since 2010 (and maybe before) not one iso C++ paper has been submitted on debugging. So maybe now is a good time to think about how we should debug C++ in a new way.
>
> To that end I had an idea the other day on debugging and wrote a blog on it and finally posted it. I don’t see how this would effect the standard but it is quality of implementation idea.
>
> If we want to constexpr all of the things it would nice if we could printf debug at least. But my idea is maybe we can get the whole debugger to work.
>
> Check it out on my blog. http://www.swardle.com/sweb/blog5.html
>
> Tell me if you have any feedback (spelling grammar or good counter ideas that shows why the idea is not posable etc...)
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG14 mailing list
> SG14_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
>