C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG14] compiler flag sanity check for error handling research
From: Matthew Bentley (mattreecebentley_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-03 22:38:00

Generally I have seen MSVC exes tend to be smaller, I assumed that's
because they're calling in system dlls for a lot of the work as
opposed to compiling it into the exe, but don't really know enough to

On 04/02/2019, Ben Craig <ben.craig_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I can do -march native.
> None of the files include iostreams. I don't include much in the way of
> C/C++ standard library headers. I use limits.h a lot. The cases that call
> abort() pull in stdlib.h. I'm using Simon Brand's <expected.hpp> header,
> and that pulls in exception, functional, type_traits, and utility. I pull
> in exception when I'm deriving from std::exception in that one batch of
> tests.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SG14 <sg14-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Matthew Bentley
>> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 8:29 PM
>> To: Low Latency:Game Dev/Financial/Trading/Simulation/Embedded Devices
>> <sg14_at_[hidden]>
>> Subject: Re: [SG14] compiler flag sanity check for error handling
>> research
>> Without reading every src file I can't comment much, but iostream bloats
>> binaries under GCC, I know that much.
>> -march=native might be useful as a comparison for GCC.
>> _______________________________________________
>> SG14 mailing list
>> SG14_at_[hidden]
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
>> 3A__lists.isocpp.org_mailman_listinfo.cgi_sg14&d=DwICAg&c=I_0YwoKy7z5L
>> MTVdyO6YCiE2uzI1jjZZuIPelcSjixA&r=y8mub81SfUi-
>> UCZRX0Vl1g&m=02GI0L6sGnhgI1Iu15qaPqb9pUef5lnsyw7ldHcW7SQ&s=cAN
>> 4Te5Z5miXkt1XYQmUC2EcIzu6OsLZoM0YUgK9KoA&e=
> _______________________________________________
> SG14 mailing list
> SG14_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14

SG14 list run by sg14-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups