So useful that it should probably appear in SD-6 SD-FeatureTest! If only I
knew the guy who was maintaining it...

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:12 AM Thomas Köppe <tkoeppe_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that!
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core <
>> core_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Core!
>>>
>>> I was contacted regarding P0614R1
>>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0614r1.html>,
>>> which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The
>>> proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested
>>> updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L").
>>>
>>> Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>> CCing SG10.
>> See Richard's response here:
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>