So useful that it should probably appear in SD-6 SD-FeatureTest! If only I knew the guy who was maintaining it...

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:12 AM Thomas Köppe <tkoeppe@google.com> wrote:
Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that!

On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core <core@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Hello Core!

I was contacted regarding P0614R1, which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L").

Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial?

Thank you!

Thomas

CCing SG10.

Barry