Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that!On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin@gmail.com> wrote:On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core <core@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:Hello Core!I was contacted regarding P0614R1, which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L").Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial?Thank you!ThomasCCing SG10.See Richard's response here: https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php.Barry