Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that!

On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core <
> core_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Core!
>>
>> I was contacted regarding P0614R1
>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0614r1.html>,
>> which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The
>> proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested
>> updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L").
>>
>> Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>
> CCing SG10.
> See Richard's response here:
> https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php.
>
> Barry
>