Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 07:34:24
On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
> Iâm wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
SG10 list run by email@example.com