C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions

From: John Spicer <jhs_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:41:24 -0500
I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.

For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas. I’d be interested in hearing opinions on which is the better direction.


> On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I have made a start at the additions we will need to make to SD-6 to reflect
> the JAX meeting; the result is attached.
> I am specifically soliciting comments on everything in the document that
> involves a question mark.
> --
> Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee)
> Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
> clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
> <jacksonville.html>_______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

Received on 2016-03-10 13:41:27