Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: John Spicer (jhs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 06:41:24
Iâm wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas. Iâd be interested in hearing opinions on which is the better direction.
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I have made a start at the additions we will need to make to SD-6 to reflect
> the JAX meeting; the result is attached.
> I am specifically soliciting comments on everything in the document that
> involves a question mark.
> Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee)
> Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
> clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
> Features mailing list
SG10 list run by email@example.com