Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 16:10:16
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
> > Iâm wondering whether some of these should be updated values of
> existing macros.
> > For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an
> update of __cpp_lambdas.
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
I can see how the ability to add "constexpr" to a lambda might be
considered just a tweak. But, for example, we already have
A new kind of capture seems to me to be a different sort of thing.
And, for example, we already have __cpp_init_captures.
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org