Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:38:48 -0500
On 03/10/2016 08:34 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
>> I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
>>
>> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
>
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but
I guess that's OK.
Jason
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
>> I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
>>
>> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
>
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but
I guess that's OK.
Jason
Received on 2016-03-10 15:44:11