Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: Jason Merrill (jason_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 08:38:48
On 03/10/2016 08:34 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
>> Iâm wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
>> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but
I guess that's OK.
SG10 list run by email@example.com