C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: John Spicer (jhs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 09:30:34

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Jason Merrill <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 08:34 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
>> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
>>> I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
>>> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
>> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
> That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but
> I guess that's OK.

The other way to go would be to have constexpr lambdas bump the value of __cpp_constexpr, or perhaps also bump both the lambda and constexpr values.


> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org