Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 00:11:09 -0400
SG16 reviewed WG21-P3677R0/WG14-N3539 (Preserving LC_CTYPE at program
start for UTF-8 locales) <https://wg21.link/p3677r0> during its
2025-07.30 meeting
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30>.
The following poll was taken:
# *POLL 2: Encourage WG14 to adopt P3677R0/N3539.*
* Attendees: 6 (1 abstention)
*
SF
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=0;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
F
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=1;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
N
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=2;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
A
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=3;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
SA
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=4;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
4 1 0 0 0
* Strong consensus.
Quorum was a bit low that day, but we still had strong consensus for
what the paper proposes.
Has WG14 reviewed this paper and established a consensus for it? Perhaps
further review in SG22 is warranted.
Tom.
start for UTF-8 locales) <https://wg21.link/p3677r0> during its
2025-07.30 meeting
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30>.
The following poll was taken:
# *POLL 2: Encourage WG14 to adopt P3677R0/N3539.*
* Attendees: 6 (1 abstention)
*
SF
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=0;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
F
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=1;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
N
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=2;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
A
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=3;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
SA
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2025/SG16Teleconference2025-07-30?sortcol=4;table=1;up=0#sorted_table>
4 1 0 0 0
* Strong consensus.
Quorum was a bit low that day, but we still had strong consensus for
what the paper proposes.
Has WG14 reviewed this paper and established a consensus for it? Perhaps
further review in SG22 is warranted.
Tom.
Received on 2025-10-26 04:12:00
