C++ Logo

liaison

Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels

From: Uecker, Martin <Martin.Uecker_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:23:34 +0000

Is this a mutual agreement?

Best,
Martin

Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 09:41 -0700 schrieb David Keaton via Liaison:
> I clearly made a mistake by not asking WG 14 to delay
> consideration of a syntax change until after we had feedback from WG 21.
> I apologize for that. Those who know me know that it is not my habit 
> to overlook liaison issues.
>
>       I would welcome a liaison submission from WG 21, or any other kind
> of paper from individual members of WG 21, discussing the C++ view on
> the subject and proposing a resolution that ends with the two languages
> being as close as possible in this regard. This could include a change
> to C, or a change to C++, or a change to both if appropriate.
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2020/08/0156.php

Received on 2020-08-12 12:27:22